June 8, 2019 By Lisa
Lyft The town of San Francisco continues, claiming that the town was violating its 10-year contract with Lyft, which might give it the unique proper to function bike share packages. San Francisco, nonetheless, says the contract doesn’t apply to shared bike with out dock, however solely to shared bike.
As a part of its lawsuit, Lyft is searching for a preliminary injunction or short-term restraining order to stop the town from issuing licenses to operators for self-service bicycle leases.
Though SF beforehand allowed JUMP, owned by Uber, to make use of its stationless electrical bikes, this assumption was presupposed to be a singular exception since Inspire, which Lyft ultimately purchased, was not but able to deploy its e-bikes with out station, signifies the method. The JUMP pilot mission ends on July 9, 2019, however the metropolis is now on the lookout for new operators to deploy e-bikes with out a station.
"We stay up for persevering with to spend money on the regional shared bike system with MTC and San Francisco," mentioned a Lyft spokesperson in a press release to TechCrunch. "We want San Francisco to satisfy its contractual commitments to this regional program and never change the foundations in the midst of the sport. We stay up for resolving this problem rapidly so we will understand our plan to carry bikes to all of San Francisco's neighborhoods. "
Lyft says it has tried to keep away from litigation however the SFMTA has refused to take part in its dispute decision course of.
"As we’ll clarify to the court docket, the settlement between Inspire and the town involved a self-service bike system," mentioned John Coté, director of communications for SF Metropolis Lawyer Dennis. Herrera, in a press release to TechCrunch. "It doesn’t give Lyft the suitable to monopolize bike sharing in San Francisco. Lyft can apply for a license for bikes with out a docking station on a par with everybody else. "
You possibly can see the complete criticism beneath.