Excessive-level voting machine producer overturns election safety and guarantees ballots

June 10, 2019 By Lisa

Excessive-level voting machine producer overturns election safety and guarantees ballots

The voting machine producer ES & S has said that it’ll "not promote" paperless voting machines as the primary voting device in a jurisdiction.

ES & S Government Director, Tom Burt, confirmed the information in an editorial.

TechCrunch understands that the choice was made across the time when 4 high-ranking Democratic lawmakers requested why ES & S and two different main voting machine producers had been nonetheless promoting identified ten-year-old machines. to comprise safety vulnerabilities

In his editorial, Burt stated that voting machines "should have a paper register of votes" to be able to stop errors or alterations that might result in an incorrect vote. Senator Ron Wyden launched a invoice a 12 months in the past that may require paper ballots verified by voters on all election machines.

The chief director additionally known as on Congress to move a regulation mandating a extra highly effective testing program for election machines.

Burt's remarks mark a reversal of the corporate's place only a 12 months in the past, by which the electoral system maker had been angered by the safety group for denouncing vulnerabilities found by hackers in the course of the annual Defcon convention.

Safety researchers on the Voter Village (electoral middle) of the convention have found a safety breach in an outdated however broadly used voting machine in dozens of states. Senior officers of the Senate Intelligence Committee responded by saying that impartial testing "is among the simplest methods to know and handle potential cybersecurity dangers."

However ES & S was not in settlement. In a letter returned, Burt stated that in his view, "exposing know-how in such environments makes hacking elections simpler, no harder, and we predict our opponents are very attentive."

A number of days later, Rob Joyce, head of cybersecurity on the NSA, criticized this response. "The ignorance of insecurity doesn’t offer you safety," he tweeted. "The examine of those units by the hacker group is a service and never a menace."

Though surprising, election safety consultants usually applauded the change of ES & S place.

Matt Blaze, professor of cryptography and pc science on the College of Pennsylvania, stated in a tweet that he was "actually comfortable" that the corporate is requesting ballots and necessary security checks .

"Let's hope that they may even cease threatening to sue folks like me and the village of Defcon vote after we study their tools and software program," he stated. Blaze, co-founder of Voting Village, was beneath authorized stress from ES & S. Election safety consultants reacted to "obscure and unsustainable threats" by accusing the voting machine maker of "discouraging" researchers from study his machines "at a time when the integrity of our electoral system is extraordinarily worrying".

ES & S spokeswoman, Katina Granger, stated the corporate "helps moral analysis and third-party intrusion checks," and provides that "the Congress ought to put in place a compulsory safety testing program for all producers of voting machines, identical requirements of testing and analysis to assist restore confidence within the safety of the elections of our nation. "

The corporate denied having made authorized threats.

Up to date with feedback from ES & S.

Learn extra:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *